Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 15248

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : August | Volume : 17 | Issue : 8 | Page : EC01 - EC06 Full Version

Clinicopathological Study of Ovarian Germ Cell Tumours in Tertiary Care Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India: A cross-sectional Study


Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60600.18244
V Lokeshwari, PI Oshin, M Gomathi, V Eswari

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Meenakshi Medical College, Hospital and Research Institute, Enathur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Meenakshi Medical College, Hospital and Research Institute, Enathur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Meenakshi Medical College, Hospital and Research Institute, Enathur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pathology, Meenakshi Medical College, Hospital and Research Institute, Enathur, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
V Lokeshwari,
“JPKM” Hospital, Abdull Apuram, Mottur, Near Pallavan Bed College and Baby Mahal, Vellore-632010, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: dr.lokeshwari07@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Ovarian germ cell tumours are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms derived from primitive germ cells of the embryonic gonad, either directly or indirectly. They can be classified as benign and malignant, with slow and rapid growth and spread, respectively. Benign ovarian germ cell tumours are common, while malignant tumours are rare and account for about 2.6% of all ovarian malignancies. They are more common in the second and third decades of life and typically present with abdominal mass, pain, and elevated serum tumour markers, which aid in primary diagnosis and follow-up.

Aim: To analyse the distribution of germ cell tumours in the ovary in relation to age, parity, mode of presentation, biochemical markers, histomorphological patterns, and immunohistochemical markers.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Pathology, Sree Balaji Medical College, Hospital and Research Institute, Chromepet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The study involved 86 ovarian specimens, of which 25 were germ cell tumours. Complete clinical history, radiological findings, and pre-operative laboratory test values were recorded. The ovarian specimens were carefully examined for gross appearances, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24-48 hours, and subjected to histopathological processing, routine and special staining, and immunohistochemical study after observing the different morphological patterns of the ovarian specimens received.

Results: The age range of presentation was between 14 years and 58 years. Seventeen patients were parous (14 benign and 3 malignant), and eight (5 benign and 3 malignant) were nulliparous. Abdominal mass and abdominal pain were the most common modes of presentation. Out of 25 germ cell tumours, 19 were benign cystic mature teratomas, 2 were immature teratomas, 1 was a yolk sac tumour, 2 were dysgerminomas, and 1 was a carcinoid tumour, with 6 being malignant and 19 being benign tumours. Among the 6 malignant ovarian tumours, 5 cases had raised serum tumour markers {cancer antigen-125 (CA-125), Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP)} pre-operatively, and the levels reduced and became normal after surgery. Among the 2 cases of immature teratoma, one was Grade-II and the other was Grade-III. For one case with mixed tumour components, CD-30 and α-fetoprotein immunohistochemical markers were performed, showing negative and positive results, respectively.

Conclusion: Among the histopathological subtypes, benign cystic teratomas were the most common ovarian germ cell tumours in this study. Both benign and malignant tumours presented with abdominal pain and abdominal mass. Most of the tumours were diagnosed between the ages of 21 and 40 years. In this study, α-fetoprotein immunohistochemical marker showed strong positivity, confirming a single tumour component.

Keywords

Alpha-fetoprotein, Dysgerminoma, Teratoma, Tumour marker, Yolk sac tumour

Germ cell tumours are rare and complex groups of heterogeneous neoplasms, comprising both benign and malignant histologies. These tumours can occur at gonadal and extragonadal sites, most commonly in the gonads (ovaries and testes), and can face diagnostic challenges for reporting pathologists in advanced cases (1). They arise from the totipotent primordial germ cells of the embryonic gonads (2) of their respective origins.

Ovarian germ cell tumours account for 20% of all ovarian neoplasms and are most commonly observed in children and young adults. They can present as monodermal tumours or as a combination of other elements, which is termed as mixed germ cell tumours. The most common malignant ovarian germ cell tumours include dysgerminoma, immature teratoma, yolk sac tumour, and mixed germ cell tumours. Less commonly, embryonal carcinomas, choriocarcinomas, and malignant struma ovarii can also occur. Malignant cases tend to behave aggressively, but the prognosis is good in younger women if fertility-preserving management is carried out (3).

Most of the tumours which are non-functional tend to present with relatively milder symptoms in the early stages, while hormonally active tumours may cause more evident clinical presentations. As the tumours grow larger, symptoms such as abdominal distension, pain, gastrointestinal and urinary tract symptoms, as well as symptoms related to tumour invasion, compression, or vaginal bleeding, may become apparent. Benign forms of the tumour are often asymptomatic and may be incidentally discovered (4).

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been consistently associated with all ovarian germ cell tumours containing yolk sac elements, while Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) serves as an indicator of trophoblastic differentiation (5). The above mentioned tumour markers are diagnostic of ovarian malignant germ cell tumours and can be useful when measured in all young patients presenting with a pelvic mass. The clinical significance of these serum tumour markers is crucial for assessment, therapy, and follow-up.

Teratomas are believed to arise from a single germ cell after the first meiotic division, requiring cross-over and exchange of genetic material between homologous chromosomes. They develop from pluripotent descendants of activated germ cells, which can differentiate into either somatic or extraembryonic tissues (5). In young patients, surgery should be conservative to preserve fertility. The prognosis is excellent as most cases are benign (6).

The present study aimed to determine various histomorphological findings, age group distribution, and clinical presentation, including serum tumour markers. Immunohistochemical markers were also used in this study to rule out tumour coexistence.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at Sree Balaji Medical College, Hospital, and Research Institute Chromepet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, from April 2015 to September 2016 in the Department of Pathology, in concordance with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC number: 002/SBMC/IHEC/2015-93).

Inclusion criteria: All benign and malignant germ cell tumours of the ovary were included.

Exclusion criteria: All inflammatory, infective conditions, and other ovarian tumours were excluded.

Procedure

The study included complete clinical history, including presenting complaints, pre-operative serum tumour marker levels, and ultrasound findings. Out of all the ovarian specimens received during the study period, only 25 were classified as germ cell tumours. The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin for 24-48 hours, and then the grossing procedure was carried out, with photographs taken. External and cut surface gross features were described. Adequate tissue samples were taken from representative areas and subjected to tissue processing. Paraffin wax blocks were prepared for embedding the tissues. Three sections, 3-4 microns in thickness, were taken for staining with hematoxylin and eosin, and poly-L-lysine-coated slides were used for immunohistochemical markers such as AFP and CD30. Dako mouse monoclonal CD30 antibody (Ber-H2) and AFP IHC Antibody mouse monoclonal AP1 were used for immunohistochemical staining in one doubtful case. The collected data were compiled, including various parameters such as age, clinico-radiological findings, and detailed histopathological examination of the tissue sections for diagnosis.

The pre-operative evaluation of serum tumour markers such as β-hCG, AFP, and CA-125 was performed with reference to their normal ranges (2) of 55-200 ng/mL, <20 ng/L, and <35 U/mL, respectively, in suspected ovarian malignancies. Biochemical values were evaluated in the laboratory using commercially available enzyme immune assay kits, and descriptive analysis was carried out.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the cases.

Results

Out of the 19 cases of benign cystic teratoma [Table/Fig-1,2], three were found incidentally during appendicectomy, hysterectomy, and lower segment caesarean section. The distribution of malignant cases in this study is as follows: immature teratoma (2 cases) (Table/Fig 3), dysgerminoma (2 cases), yolk sac tumour (1 case), and carcinoid tumour (1 case). Associated conditions such as leiomyoma (3 cases), acute appendicitis (3 cases), pregnancy (1 case), hypertension (2 cases), prolapse (1 case), diabetes mellitus (2 cases), fever (1 case), and anaemia (1 case) were noted. One case was suspicious of both yolk sac elements and embryonal tumour components, for which two immunohistochemical markers (α-fetoprotein and CD30) were performed. The results showed positivity for α-fetoprotein and negative CD30 marker, confirming the absence of mixed components in that case (Table/Fig 4) (IHC). The histological distribution of ovarian germ cell tumours comprised 19 cases of mature teratoma (76%), two cases of immature teratoma (8%), dysgerminoma two cases (8%), yolk sac tumour one case (4%) and carcinoid one case (4%) (Table/Fig 5).

The most common age group was between 21-30 years of age with 11 cases (Table/Fig 6). Unilaterality was detected in 22 cases (88%), and bilateral involvement was observed in three cases (12%). The dimensions of the ovarian specimens with germ cell tumours in this study ranged from 2 to 14 cm (Table/Fig 7). Out of the 25 ovarian tumours, 10 (36%) were cystic, 6 (24%) were solid, and mixed components were seen in nine cases (36%) (Table/Fig 8). Among the 19 benign tumours, 14 were observed in parous women and five in nulliparous women (Table/Fig 9). Among the six malignant cases, three were found in parous women and three in nulliparous women. The most common tumour was benign cystic teratoma, and the most common mode of presentation was abdominal mass with pain (Table/Fig 10). Ultrasound findings of these tumours showed hyperechoic appearance in 15 cases (60%), hypoechoic appearance in four cases (16%), and mixed echoes in six cases (24%) [Table/Fig-11-13]. Serum tumour markers such as CA 125, AFP, and β-HCG were measured, and one or two markers were found to be elevated in malignant cases (Table/Fig 14).

The serum tumour markers were noted with many fold raise pre-operatively in malignant cases only.

Discussion

The ovaries are intra-pelvic paired organs of female genital system which produces ova for fertilisation and also involved in developement of secondary sexual characters the ovaries are paired intra-pelvic organs of the female reproductive system that produces ova for fertilisation and contribute to the development of secondary sexual characteristics. Ovarian neoplasms originating from germ cells are the second largest group of tumours after surface epithelial tumours. They can be benign or malignant, with malignant cases being rare, accounting for about 2-5% of cases (7). Present study included 25 ovarian germ cell tumours out of a total of 86 ovarian tumours observed, with 19 being benign cystic mature teratomas. These tumours are relatively common in younger women but can also occur in infants and older women. Pre-operative serum tumour markers were elevated in malignant cases.

Immunohistochemical staining was used in one case to confirm the presence of tumour tissue in the same gonad. The incidence of ovarian germ cell tumours in the present study (29.06%) was similar to previous studies by Sharma I and Chaliha T (30.39%) and Gupta SC et al., (31.08%) (5),(8). The incidence of benign cystic teratomas (18.6%) in this study was comparable to that reported by Rajan R (17.74%) (9). Grossly, benign cystic teratomas appeared as cystic structures, while microscopic examination revealed elements from germ cell layers such as skin with pilosebaceous glands, bony and adipose tissue, intestinal glands, respiratory epithelium, and islands of cartilage with glial tissue (Table/Fig 2). The age range in this study was 14 to 58 years, similar to the age distribution reported by Jadhav BJ and Shinde AM for all ovarian germ cell tumours and malignant ovarian GCTs. Most benign tumours occurred in the 3rd decade of life, while malignant cases were more common in the third and fourth decades. The mean age of patients in this study (29.8 years) was similar to that reported by Jadhav BJ and Shinde AM (29 years) (10).

Jadhav BJ and Shinde AM reported 11 ovarian germ cell tumours, with 8 patients (72.7%) being parous and three patients (27.3%) being nulliparous (10). In this study, the majority of tumours occurred in parous women. The most common presenting symptom in this study was abdominal pain with a mass, followed by abdominal pain. Similarly, Jadhav BJ and Shinde AM also observed that pain associated with an abdominal mass (7/11-63.63%) was the most common symptom. Out of 25 ovarian germ cell tumours in this study, 17 women were parous and 8 were nulliparous. Among the parous women, 14 cases were benign and 3 cases were malignant. Among the nulliparous women, 5 cases were benign and 3 cases were malignant (10). Lim FK et al., reported 13 malignant germ cell tumours of the ovary, with 9 patients being nulliparous and 4 being parous. They also observed that the mean tumour size was 15.69±10.51% (11). In the present study, the majority (60%) of ovarian germ cell tumours presented on the left side. Two cases of benign mature cystic teratoma were found to be bilateral, and in another case, an immature teratoma was found on the right side while a benign cystic mature teratoma was on the left side. Similar findings were found in a study conducted by Mahalakshmi K (right 60%, left 36.7%, bilateral 3.3%) (12). Caruso PA et al., reported that 10% of benign cystic teratomas are bilateral (13). Srikanth S and Anandam G reported a bilateral dermoid cyst of the ovary in 2014, which is similar to the findings of this study (14). Jha R and Jha S observed an equal number of cases on both the right and left sides, with none of the cases being bilateral (15). The largest ovarian germ cell tumour encountered in this study was 14×11×5 cm, and the smallest was 2×1×0.5 cm, with tumour sizes ranging from 2 cm to 14 cm. Radiologically, out of 22/25 ovarian germ cell tumours, 14 cases showed cystic lesions, 2 cases showed solid lesions, and 6 cases showed mixed lesions. In this study, Smith HO et al., observed malignant degeneration in mature teratoma, constituting 2.9% (16). Two cases of benign teratoma with malignant transformation (10%) were observed in the study conducted by Piura B et al., (17), Gupta N et al., did not find any malignant tumours of the ovary and only reported benign cystic teratomas (18).

Immature teratoma: These tumours constitute about 8% (2 cases) of all ovarian germ cell tumours in this study. They presented as Grade-II and Grade-III tumours with a significant increase in serum tumour markers. Grossly, these tumours were both solid and cystic and were also found with a breached capsule (Table/Fig 1)b. Microscopically, they showed primitive neuroepithelium with hyperchromatic nuclei arranged in the form of rosettes and primitive neuroectodermal elements (Table/Fig 3)a-c. Sharma I and Chaliha T reported an incidence of 0.98%, Sarkar R reported an incidence of 1.6%, De Backer A et al., reported six cases (13%), Zynger DL et al., reported four cases in the ovary, Chavan SS and Toppo SM reported four cases (4.34%), Sharma P et al., reported one case (0.77%), Deka M et al., reported one case, and Jha R and Karki S reported two cases among 26 ovarian tumours, which is comparable to the present study (5),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25).

Dysgerminoma: Kurman RJ and Norris HJ stated that these tumours represent 13.5% of all ovarian germ cell tumours and most commonly occur in the 2nd and 3rd decades with unilateral presentation (26). According to Freel JH et al., 80-85% of dysgerminomas occur before the age of 30 years, and 40-45% occur before the age of 20 years (27). Mondal SK et al., reported that dysgerminoma is considered the most common tumour, constituting nearly 50% of all malignant ovarian germ cell tumours (28). Garshenoson DM et al., observed that the right ovary is more commonly involved in these tumours (29). Asadourian LA and Tayler HB stated that about 10% of these tumours are bilateral at operation, while Francisco C et al., stated that there is no bilateral involvement based on their 10 years of study involving 343 ovarian tumours (30),(31). Two cases of dysgerminoma were found in this study, representing 8% of all germ cell tumours. Sharma I and Chaliha T reported two cases (6.46%), Chavan SS and Toppo SM reported seven cases (7.6%), Gupta SC et al., reported an incidence of 3.53% (5),(22),(32). Francisco C et al., (1993) reported an incidence of 2.9% (31), Sarkar R (1996) reported 5.3%, Deka M et al., reported 6 out of 12 cases, and Schultz KA et al., reported seven cases (7.4%) of dysgerminoma in their study (19),(24),(33). Microscopically, these tumours showed large tumour cells with vesicular nuclei and clear cytoplasm arranged in nests separated by fibrous stroma with lymphocytes (Table/Fig 3)d.

Yolk Sac tumour: Yolk sac tumour or endodermal sinus tumour is the 2nd most common highly malignant ovarian germ cell neoplasm (26). It occurs more frequently in childhood and adolescence, with a mean age of 19 years, and is rare in women older than 40 years. Serum AFP levels are almost always elevated, and immunohistochemical markers such as AFP, Glypican-3, and cytokeratin show positivity (34). One case of yolk sac tumour in this study showed positivity to AFP (Table/Fig 4). Sharma I and Chaliha T reported an incidence of only 0.98%, Sarkar R reported an incidence of 2.1%, De Backer A et al., reported 3 out of 69 cases, Zynger DL et al., reported four cases, Chavan SS and Toppo SM reported two cases (2.17%), Deka M et al., reported two cases (1.81%), Jha R and Karki S reported 1 out of 26 cases (3.8%), Mondal SK et al., reported 12 out of 170 cases (1.25%), Francisco C et al., (1993) reported an incidence of 0.29%, Schultz KA et al., reported two cases (3%), Ulbright TM reported an incidence of 1%, which is comparable to this study representing one case with an incidence of 4% (5),(19),(20),(21),(22),(24),(25),(28),(31),(33),(35). Microscopically, the yolk sac elements were arranged in a solid pattern that merged with surrounding microcystic areas (Table/Fig 3)e.

Embryonal carcinoma: Kurman RJ and Norris HJ in 1978 reported that embryonal carcinoma accounts for 5% of all malignant germ cell tumours of the ovary (26). Ulbright TM and Benjapibal M et al., studies show an incidence of 0.2% and 2.8% of embryonal carcinoma, respectively (35),(36).

Carcinoid tumour: Piura B et al., reported a 5% incidence of carcinoid tumours, which is similar to the current study. Microscopically, they show nests of round to oval tumour cells with clumped chromatin (Table/Fig 3)f (17).

Struma ovarii: Jadhav BJ and Shinde AM observed 1 out of 11 cases (9.09%), and Piura B et al., reported a 5% incidence of struma ovarii in their study (10),(17).

Mixed germ cell tumours of ovary: In this study, no mixed germ cell tumours of the ovary were observed.

Limitation(s)

Firstly the smaller sample size, with only 25 cases were included in this study. Additionally, the study period was short, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations. The conclusions drawn from the results can only be tentative and may only apply to the specific location where the study was conducted. Thirdly, all cases had pre-operative evaluation of all serum tumour markers, and only specific immunohistochemical markers were used. This may have limited the comprehensive assessment of tumour markers and potentially affected the accuracy of diagnosis. And lastly, this study lacks available data on post-treatment follow-up and information on the history of recurrences. This limits the understanding of long-term outcomes and the potential for assessing the effectiveness of treatment in these cases.

Conclusion

This study carefully analysed ovarian germ cell tumours in terms of their incidence, parity, clinico-radiological presentation, association with elevated serum tumour markers, histopathological findings, and immunohistochemical staining. These tumours primarily affect the reproductive age group, posing a challenge in preserving fertility while ensuring patient cure. The study also identified various histomorphological findings from all three germ cell layers and their malignant counterparts. Histopathological examination and the use of immunohistochemical markers such as α-fetoprotein and CD30 played an essential role in confirming the diagnosis of these tumours.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to take privilege to express deep sense of gratitude to respected guide and esteemed teacher Dr. SHANTHI VIJAYALAKSHMI, MD, Professor of Pathology, Department of Pathology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, for her constant help, valuable advice and for the guidance throughout the study. We the authors are grateful for her ever-willing keenness to help and guide which was a constant source of inspiration to us.

References

1.
Jena A, Patnayak R, Kumar N, Chowhan A, Devi B, Lakshmi AY. Potpourri: Testicular tumor- combination of seminoma, teratoma and yolk sac tumour of testis in a young adult male. J Clin Sci Res. 2014;3(4):257-60. [crossref]
2.
Blaustein A. Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. 5th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2002;1391.
3.
Tamauchi S, Kajiyama H, Yoshihara M, Ikeda Y, Yoshikawa N, Nishino K, et al. Reproductive outcomes of 105 malignant ovarian germ cell tumor survivors: A multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(4):385.e1-e7. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JC. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, Professional Edition e-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
5.
Sharma I, Chaliha T. Histopathological patterns of germ cell tumours of the ovary in a tertiary level hospital. Int J Pharm Sci Inventions. 2014;3(10):14-24.
6.
Vaysse C, Delsol M, Carfagna L, Bouali O, Combelles S, Lemasson F, et al. Ovarian germ cell tumors in children. Management, survival and ovarian prognosis. A report of 75 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(7):1484-90. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Mills SE, Carter D, Greenson JK, Reuter VE, Stoler MH. Sternberg’s Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
8.
Gupta SC, Singh PA, Mchrotra TN. A clinicopathological study of ovarian tumours. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1986;29(4):354-62.
9.
Rajan R. Analysis of ovarian pathologies in the modern perspective. Indian J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;44:764-70.
10.
Jadhav BJ, Shinde AM. Ovarian germ cell tumour: a 3-year study. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2005;55(1):61-63. https://jogi.co.in/storage/articles/files/filebase/Archives/1994/oct/1994_764_770_Oct.pdf.
11.
Lim FK, Chanrachakul B, Chong SM, Ratnam SS. Malignant ovarian germ cell tumours: Experience in the National University Hospital of Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1998;27(5):657-61. PMID: 9919335.
12.
Mahalakshmi K. Study of clinico pathological significance of C-Kit expression in germ cell tumours of ovary with special reference to Dysgerminoma [dissertation]. Chennai: Madras Medical College; April 2013. http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/354/.
13.
Caruso PA, Marsh MR, Minkowitz S, Karten G. An intense clinicopathologic study of 305 teratomas of the ovary. Cancer. 1971;27(2):343-48. 3.0.CO;2-B>[crossref][PubMed]
14.
Srikanth S, Anandam G. Bilateral dermoid cyst of ovary. Med J Dr DY Patil Univ. 2014;7(4):492. [crossref]
15.
Jha R, Jha S. Study of malignant germ cell tumors with special reference to malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: 5 years experience. J Pathol Nep [Internet]. 2012;2(4):289-92. [crossref]
16.
Smith HO, Berwick M, Verschraegen CF, Wiggins C, Lansing L, Muller CY, et al. Incidence and survival rates for female malignant germ cell tumors. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):1075-85. Doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000216004.22588.ce. PMID: 16648414. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Piura B, Dgani R, Zalel Y, Nemet D, Yanai-Inbar I, Cohen Y, et al. Malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary: A study of 20 cases. J Surg Oncol. 1995;59(3):155-61. DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930590305. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Gupta N, Bisht D, Agarwal AK, Sharma VK. Retrospective and prospective study of ovarian tumours and tumour-like lesions. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2007;50(3):525-27.
19.
Sarkar R. Ovarian neoplasms-14 years study. Obstet Gynecol J India. 1996;46:156-59. https://www.jogi.co.in/articles/files/filebase/Archives/1996/feb/1996_156_159_Feb.pdf.
20.
De Backer A, Madern GC, Oosterhuis JW, Hakvoort-Cammel FG, Hazebroek FW. Ovarian germ cell tumors in children: A clinical study of 66 patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;46(4):459-64. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Zynger DL, Everton MJ, Dimov ND, Chou PM, Yang XJ. Expression of glypican 3 in ovarian and extragonadal germ cell tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130(2):224-30. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Chavan SS, Toppo SM. Study of 92 cases of ovarian germ cell tumour at a tertiary health care center. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2019;6(3):464-70. [crossref]
23.
Sharma P, Rao PS, Mogra N, Talreja K. Histopathological study of ovarian tumours in a tertiary healthcare center of southern Rajasthan. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2020;7(4):561-66. [crossref]
24.
Deka M, Saikia CJ, Bezbaruah R. Analysis of germ cell tumors of ovary in a tertiary care hospital: A two-year retrospective study. Int J Sci Study. 2016;4(1):173-77.
25.
Jha R, Karki S. Histological pattern of ovarian tumors and their age distribution. Nepal Med Coll J. 2008;10(2):81-85.
26.
Kurman RJ, Norris HJ. Malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary. Hum Pathol. 1977;8(5):551-64. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Freel JH, Cassir JF, Pierce VK, Woodruff J, Lewis JL. Dysgerminoma of ovary. Cancer. 1979;43(3):798-805. 3.0.CO;2-P>[crossref][PubMed]
28.
Mondal SK, Bandyopadhyay R, Nag DR, Roychowdhury S, Mondal PK, Sinha SK. Histologic pattern, bilaterality and clinical evaluation of 957 ovarian neoplasms: A 10-year study in a tertiary hospital of eastern India. J Cancer Res Ther. 2011;7(4):433-37. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Gershenson DM, Copeland LJ, Wharton T, Atkinson EN, Sneige N, Edwards CL, et al. Prognosis of surgically determined complete responders in advanced ovarian cancer. Cancer. 1985;55(5):1129-35. 3.0.CO;2-O>[crossref][PubMed]
30.
Asadourian LA, Tayler HB. Dysgerminoma: An analysis of 105 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1969;33(3):370-79.
31.
Francisco C, Nadkarni N, Rebello M. Ovarian tumours in Goa: A clinicopathological study. Indian J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;43(3):408-12.
32.
Gupta SC, Singh PA, Mchrotra TN, R Agarwal. A clinicopathological study of ovarian tumours. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1986;29(4):354-62.
33.
Schultz KA, Sencer SF, Messinger Y, Neglia JP, Steiner ME. Pediatric ovarian tumours: A review of 67 cases. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005;44(2):167-73. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Cotta CV. Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry Theranostic and Genomic Applications by David J. Dabbs. 6th Edition - November 23, 2021; ISBN: 9780323721721.
35.
Ulbright TM. Germ cell tumors of the gonads: A selective review emphasizing problems in differential diagnosis, newly appreciated, and controversial issues. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(Suppl 2):S61-79. Doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800310. PMID: 15761467. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Benjapibal M, Vichaidith P, Paholpak W, Kongprasit T, Suphanit I. Primary epithelial cancer and malignant germ cell tumor of the ovary: A review of 368 cases. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;13(1):23-28.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60600.18244

Date of Submission: Oct 06, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 19, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 06, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 07, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 02, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 10

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com